In a video the team published online, they covered roads, multilane highways, a crossing zone with pedestrians. In the tests, Gerber took the wheel, O’Dowd rode shotgun, and they drove around Santa Barbara, Calif.-or were driven, if you will, with Gerber’s assistance. If it’s ‘won’t,’ that’s criminal if it’s ‘can’t,’ that’s not much better.” -Dan O’Dowd, the Dawn Project “We’ve reported dozens of bugs, and either they can’t or won’t fix them. He likened it instead to a student driver, and the human being behind the wheel to a driving instructor. The FSD scrutiny O’Dowd is bringing to bear on the EV maker is only the latest in a string of recent knocks-including a Tesla shareholder lawsuit about overblown FSD promises, insider allegations of fakery in FSD promotional events, and a recent company data leak that includes thousands of FSD customer complaints.Īt yesterday’s livestreamed event, O’Dowd said FSD doesn’t do what its name implies, and that what it does do, it does badly enough to endanger lives.
The real challenge came after their talk, when the two men got into a Tesla Model S and tested its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software-a purportedly autonomous or near-autonomous driving technology that represents the high end of its suite of driver-assistance features the company calls Autopilot and Advanced Autopilot. Yesterday, in a livestreamed event, Dan O’Dowd-a software billionaire and vehement critic of Tesla Motors’ allegedly self-driving technologies-debated Ross Gerber, an investment banker who backs the company.
0 kommentar(er)
